HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons) are often touted as a replacement for CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) due to their lower ozone-depleting potential. However, they are not a suitable long-term replacement because they have their own negativeenvironmentalimpact.One major issue with HFCs is that they absorb infraredradiation, contributing to global warming. In addition, while they are not as toxic as some other chemicals, they can still have negative health effects with prolonged exposure. Finally, while they are not flammable, they are still a greenhouse gas and contribute to climate change. Therefore, it is important to continue to seek out alternatives to both CFCs and HFCs that have minimal environmental impact and can provide long-term,sustainablereplacements. In summary, HFCs are not an appropriate replacement for CFCs in the long-term due to their contribution to global warming through infrared absorption.To know more aboutReplacementvisit:brainly.com/question/24004171#SPJ11...

Unlock to view answer

Unlock full access for 72 hours, watch your grades skyrocket.

For just $0.99 cents, get access to the powerful quizwhiz chrome extension that automatically solves your homework using AI. Subscription renews at $5.99/week.