Answered by AI, Verified by Human Experts
a. The Totalfinancial impactis $25200. b. The total financial impact of $25,200 favors the alternative of buying the part from the supplier.To analyze the financial impact of buying part Q89 from the supplier instead of producing it internally, we need to compare the costs of the two alternatives. Let's calculate the financial impact and determine the preferred alternative:a. Financial impact report:Cost of producingpart Q89 internally:Direct materials: $7.10 per unit × 8,300 units = $59,230Direct labor: $4.00 per unit × 8,300 units = $33,200Variable overhead: $7.90 per unit × 8,300 units = $65,770Supervisor's salary: $3.00 per unit × 8,300 units = $24,900Depreciation of special equipment: $2.60 per unit × 8,300 units = $21,580Allocated general overhead: $1.40 per unit × 8,300 units = $11,620Total cost of producing internally = $59,230 + $33,200 + $65,770 + $24,900 + $21,580 + $11,620 = $216,300Cost of buying part Q89 from the supplier:Cost per unit from the supplier: $25.00 per unit × 8,300 units = $207,500Additional segment margin from using the space for other products: $16,400Total financial impact:Cost savings by buying from the supplier = Cost of producing internally - Cost of buying from the supplier= $216,300 - $207,500 = $8,800Additionalsegmentmargin = $16,400Total financial impact = Cost savings + Additional segment margin= $8,800 + $16,400 = $25,200b. Based on the financial impact analysis, the company should choose to buy part Q89 from the supplier instead of producing it internally. The financial impact shows a cost savings of $8,800 by purchasing from the supplier and an additional segment margin of $16,400 by utilizing the space for otherproducts. Therefore, the total financial impact of $25,200 favors the alternative of buying the part from the supplier.For more aboutfinancial impact:brainly.com/question/30353261#SPJ4...