Answered by AI, Verified by Human Experts
Final answer:Historian Charles Beardarguedthat the conflict over the Constitution could be seen in economic class terms, with wealthy property holders in favor and poorer elements of the community opposed. Urban Americans, rich and poor alike, were in favor of ratification,believingit would encourage commerce and business activity, while both rich and poor rural Americans opposed it.Explanation:Historian Charles Beard argued in 1913 that conflict over theConstitutioncould be seen in economic class terms with wealthy property holders in favor of the Constitution and poorer elements of the community opposed. While economic concerns were important in determining an American's opinion on the Constitution, it nevertheless appears not to have been a struggle between haves and have-nots. Rather, it appears that urban Americans, rich and poor alike, were in favor of ratification, believing that the Constitution would encourage commerce and business activity. Both rich and poor rural Americans, however, opposed it. Their opposition was not good news for the Federalists because the vast majority of Americans were the people whom Jefferson called "thechosenpeople of God," in other words, the farmers.Learn more about Charles Beard's criticism of the Constitution here:brainly.com/question/4994000#SPJ11...