Final answer:The Massachusetts Bay Colony differed from a theocracy in its governance structure, where religious leaders were influential but did not hold direct governing power. The colony was governed by a charter that required church membership for political participation, evolving over time to allow more democratic elements while still being influenced by religious beliefs.Explanation:The Massachusetts Bay Colony was distinct from a theocracy in several ways, but most notably in how it structured its leadership and governance. Unlike a strict theocracy where religious leaders govern directly in the name of deity, in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, ministers were influential but did not hold governing power. Governance was outlined in the Massachusetts Bay Charter, which allowed only church members to be freemen with the right to vote or hold public office, indicating a blend of secular and religious qualifications for political participation. However, these ministers did not govern directly. The governor and assistants, elected from among the freemen who were also required to be church members, made the laws. This setup formed a government influenced by religious beliefs without being a pure theocracy, where religious leaders rule outright.Over time, the government evolved. Initially, the office of Assistant was for life, but it was later decided that freemen, not assistants, would elect the governor. These changes, along with the expansion of the General Court to include representatives from surrounding towns, moved the colony even further from theocratic governance, emphasizing a mixed form of government where the Puritan church influenced, but did not directly control, the political structure....

Unlock to view answer

Unlock full access for 72 hours, watch your grades skyrocket.

For just $0.99 cents, get access to the powerful quizwhiz chrome extension that automatically solves your homework using AI. Subscription renews at $5.99/week.