Answered by AI, Verified by Human Experts
Final answer:Following a riot at the prison she supervised, Safiya was immediately fired. Safiya appealed her termination to the Corrections Board saying that the approach to resolvingethical dilemmasmeant she was entitled to the fundamental right of due process, procedural would include an investigation and hearing prior to any decision about her job status. Thus, the correct answer is option D.Explanation:Safiya'sappealto the Corrections Board, arguing for an investigation and hearing prior to any decision about her job status, is grounded in the concept of procedural justice (option D). Procedural justice emphasizes fairness in the procedures or processes involved in decision-making. Safiya is asserting her entitlement to due process, which includes a fair and unbiased investigation and an opportunity to present her case before any determination regarding her job status is made. This aligns with the principles of proceduraljustice.The other options, moral-rights (A), impartial (B), and individual (C), do not accurately capture the aspect of advocating for a fair process andinvestigation, which is the essence of Safiya's appeal.Learn more aboutethical dilemmasbrainly.com/question/38233249#SPJ11...